Charlton Athletic manager Nathan Jones has responded to comments from Birmingham City boss Chris Davies regarding the Addicks’ tactical approach and transfer spending.
The exchange follows Charlton’s recent 1-0 victory over Birmingham at The Valley, where Davies suggested that Charlton’s focus was on nullifying Birmingham’s play rather than playing their own game. Jones, however, firmly rejected this characterisation, stating that his side’s strategy is about imposing their strengths on the opposition.
Davies was candid after his side’s defeat, noting that Birmingham “just didn’t seem ourselves” and lacked energy and fluency. He highlighted Charlton’s man-to-man pressing as a key factor in disrupting his team’s usual rhythm. “Charlton were man-to-man pressing us. Their job was to stop us, rather than do too much with the ball,” said Davies, suggesting that Charlton’s main focus was on containment.
However, Jones was quick to defend his team’s tactics. Speaking ahead of Charlton’s next match against Stockport County, Jones addressed the remarks. “Contrary to what some people say, we don’t set up just to stop people playing,” said Jones. “We have certain principles that we don’t come away from. How we set up is how we feel we can hurt the opposition.”
Charlton’s Tactical Approach: Playing to Their Strengths
Nathan Jones went on to elaborate on Charlton’s tactical philosophy, emphasising that his side always looks to play on their own terms. “Regardless of how people want to see it, we are ourselves in every game,” said Jones. “We try to play and we had more shots on target. We created the clearer chances. So, realistically, I’m not sure what anyone can say about that performance, other than it was fantastic.”
The Charlton manager added that trying to beat Birmingham at their own fluent, possession-based game would have been a mistake. “If you are sloppy and say: ‘Okay, we’ll take you on in a footballing game’, then invariably they will win. But we said, ‘We have these strengths, and we’re going to impose them on you,’” Jones explained, defending the tactical plan that secured a crucial win for his team.
He also reiterated that his team’s identity remains consistent, regardless of the opponent. “In and out of possession, we are set up to be Charlton Athletic, regardless of anyone else.”
Addressing Birmingham’s ‘Spent a Fortune’ Comment
Chris Davies also raised the issue of Charlton’s spending, remarking that the Addicks had “spent a fortune” on their squad. Birmingham’s summer expenditure, estimated to be between £20-£25 million, has included notable investments such as Jay Stansfield, reportedly signed for over £10 million. Davies’ comments implied that Charlton had also invested heavily in their squad to compete at the top end of League One.
Jones, however, downplayed these claims. “I don’t know what he classes as fortunes,” Jones responded. “We have spent more than a lot of League One sides, but I wouldn’t quite call it fortunes. We have been very thrifty in the transfer market.”
While acknowledging that Charlton had invested in their squad, Jones was keen to highlight that financial restrictions at the club limited their spending capabilities. “We can’t spend fortunes because there are restrictions at the club—financial fair play. We can only spend what we can spend,” he said. Jones also stated that Charlton’s spending, while healthy compared to some sides, was modest in comparison to others.
Jones concluded his comments by steering clear of any brewing disagreement, stating, “I try not to get embroiled in arguments. I try to keep everything in-house about speaking about Charlton. When I get angry, I get angry about Charlton, not anybody else.”
Our View
Nathan Jones’ response to Chris Davies’ comments highlights the competitive nature of League One, where financial constraints and tactical approaches are often scrutinised. Jones, who has built Charlton’s identity around playing to their own strengths, clearly feels that the Addicks’ approach is both effective and misunderstood by some rivals.
From a tactical standpoint, Jones makes a valid argument. His decision to press Birmingham high and impose Charlton’s strengths was a well-executed strategy that secured three crucial points. While Birmingham’s Chris Davies might have been frustrated by the result, Jones’ ability to adapt and execute a plan against the league leaders deserves credit.
On the financial front, the exchange between the two managers also reflects the varied spending power within the league. While Birmingham’s spending has been significant, Jones was right to point out that Charlton have had to navigate financial limitations. Regardless, the debate over spending is unlikely to diminish any time soon, especially as both sides continue to compete at the top of League One.
Leave a Reply